The eventual nationalisation of Northern Rock was likely as soon as the decision to bail them out was made by the government shortly after the crisis blew up. That was the logic of situation.
It will, of course, be problematic for various reasons. What are the politics of repossession of people's homes by a nationalised bank? There is a substantial financial risk here, because Northern Rock was offering 125% mortages; what will the value of the collateral be if house prices take a really big tumble?
The lesson of this seems to be that the private sector is happy to take risk unless there is a prospect of loss, in which case the government is expected to bail out reckless behaviour.
Prenumerera på:
Kommentarer till inlägget (Atom)
Battery trains fool’s gold
A piece by the railway news video Green Signals recently reported the fast charging trials for battery operated electric trains on the West ...
-
I wrote to my MP on two entirely separate issues recently. The first was to do with the replacement for the Inter City 125 train, which at £...
-
The FT has run a couple of pieces on Sweden this week. The first was a report of the outbreak of car burning, the second, today, on the rise...
-
The Four Freedoms are a recipe for strife unless they are accompanied by a Fifth Freedom. Land needs to be free, free as air. And freedom to...
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar