Fortsätt till huvudinnehåll

Stupidityvirus epidemic

The EU/UK trade negotiations are beginning to look like what in Swedish is known as snopp fäktning. The British position can be summarised as ‛if you do not stop shooting yourself in the feet, we will start to shoot ourselves in the feet’. Shooting its own people in the feet is standard operating procedure in the EU, which takes care of its powerful and vocal producer interests at the expense of everyone else. The UK government is, on account of its free trade traditions, slightly better in this respect. I wish British commentators, and politicians generally, would, for a change, look at the situation from our (I am on the continent) point of view. From the way so many are talking, anyone would think that we (in the EU) only buy British because we feel sorry for them.

The EU is doing us no favours with its negotiating position of threatening to apply tariffs and restrictions on imports from the UK. Here in Gothenburg there is one shop which specialises in British decorating products including Farrow and Ball, and Little Green. Restrictions will affect both the shop and its customers. There are no equivalent replacement product. Another local shop sells popular UK ceramic tableware brands as a major line. Our local garden shops sell brands like Spear and Jackson. Ditto the tool shop. Microbreweries and home brewing supplier use and stock British hops, malt, yeast and sundries. Fisherman’s Friends are popular. Although most of our fish is locally caught, and quite a lot of it from the Baltic and from lakes (pike, zander and perch), there will be a bit of a shortage of fish and prices will rise. Then there is the general issue of spare parts and consumables. The list goes on and on.

The EU’s negotiators are adopting a position which will make a lot of things scarce or dearer. They are shooting us in the feet. Ireland will be particularly badly hit because 25% of its imports are sourced from the UK and it will cost more to transport alternatives from mainland Europe; it is a long way through the Straits of Dover and round Land's End. The end result will be that the EU, already unpopular for a raft of reasons, will become even more unpopular.

The current UK negotiating position is equally absurd. The ‘threat’ is that the UK will cut itself off from EU suppliers, which from us includes SKF ball bearings made from high quality Swedish steel made from the very pure ore from the Kiruna mine.

There is a financial side to this as well. If the UK is unconditionally open to imports from the EU (and everywhere else), then sterling balances accumulate in the supplier countries, which will boost exports from the UK. It seems to be little appreciated that imports prime the pump for a country's exports by creating foreign held balances in its currency.

The best thing the UK government could do would be to announce that it will just open the doors to imports from the EU (and everywhere else), whatever the EU does. If the EU negotiators are sensible they will follow suit. If they do not, and they probably will not, since being sensible is not their style, there are soon going to be complaints from consumers, businesses and manufacturers in the EU who find their supplies have been cut off by order of Brussels.

Kommentarer

Very Good.

I was on Twitter earlier. The level of ignorance is without bounds. When I move a dark cloud to the side, exposing a 'shining star', they go hysterical calling me all sorts of names without good reason as if I were the devil incarnate. I can only explain this by whatever ideology is informing them to protect it from reality.

Given the nature of this knowledge is such dynamite, surely there must be something much much deeper going on in the collective psyche. A demon of sorts?

Populära inlägg i den här bloggen

Importing people to sustain demand

I got involved in a discussion with a Youtuber called “Philosophy all along”. This was in connection with criticism of Trump’s policy of deporting illegal migrants, which he argued would be bad for the economy as it would reduce demand. This implies that there is a need to import people to sustain demand. There is no obvious reason why a population should not be able to consume everything that the same population produces. If it can not, then something else is going on. It is a basic principle that wages are the least that workers will accept to do a job. Wages are a share of the value added by workers through their wages. The remainder is distributed as economic rent, after government has taken its cut in taxes. Monopoly profit is a temporary surplus that after a delay gets absorbed into economic rent. Land values in Silicon Valley are an example of this; it's like a gold rush. The miners get little out of it. Rent and tax syphon purchasing power away from those who produce the g...

The dreadfulness of British governance

I wrote to my MP on two entirely separate issues recently. The first was to do with the replacement for the Inter City 125 train, which at £2.6 million per vehicle, is twice as expensive as it ought to be. The second concerned the benefits of a switch from business rate and Council Tax to a tax based on site values. In both cases, the replies were full of spurious, unsubstantiated assertions and completely flawed arguments. This is typical. You will not get an iota of sense from the government on any area of public policy at all - finance, economics, trade and employment, agriculture, housing, health, transport, energy. All junk. If you write to your MP you will invariably receive answers that are an insult to your intelligence, no matter what subject you are writing about. Of course they cannot understand statistics. They are innumerate. Whitehall is staffed with idiots with a high IQ. Look at their IT projects. And mind your purse, they will have that too.

How much more will the British tolerate?

The British are phlegmatic, tolerant and slow to rouse. Thus there was no great reaction after the terrorist attack in July 2005. The murder of Lee Rigby created a sense of outrage, but nothing more, since it appeared to be an isolated incident. Two serious incidents within a fortnight are another matter. Since the first major terrorist incident in 2001, authority has tried to persuade the public that Islam is a religion of peace, that these were isolated events, or the actions of deranged "lone wolves", having nothing to do with Islam, or to reassure that the chances of being killed in a terrorist attack were infinitesimally small. These assurances are are beginning to wear thin. They no longer convince. If government does not act effectively, people will take the law into their own hands. What, however, would effective action look like? What sort of effective action would not amount to rough justice for a lot of innocent people? Given the difficulties of keeping large n...