Fortsätt till huvudinnehåll

WCML fiasco - and the IEP tendering procedure

I will not comment on the WCML fiasco except to say that it points up the need to look at the way the IEP contract was awarded.

The original specification for the IEP was not met by any of the submissions from the competing tenders. The final specification for the trains that have been ordered is significantly different from that in the original tender.

The train manufacturing companies could reasonably argue that they never had the opportunity to bid on the basis of the final specification. Whether they would be within their rights to ask for a judicial review is a matter for the lawyers, but given that IEP is extraordinarily bad money, as was point out by Foster, suggests that the taxpayers would have an interest in the outcome.

Kommentarer

strawbrick sa…
On the WCML bid, the Minister has said that "These flaws stem from the way the level of risk in the bids was evaluated. Mistakes were made in the way in which inflation and passenger numbers were taken into account ..."

It could not possibly be the case that either the "can carriers", or the processes, or the software deployed on the WCML were involved in producing the figures for HS2 for IEP? Could it?
Anonymous sa…
Can you give details of what makes the current design "significantly different from that in the original tender."
Anonymous sa…
If there are errors in the figures for HS2 then given the growth is based on about 2.5% per year rather than the 5% plus of Virgin & First in their tenders it is unlikely that they will be too low.
strawbrick sa…
So, the best minds at the DfT predicted HS2 2.5% a year. A year later the WCML franchise bidders predicted 5% a year, i.e. twice as much. And nobody thought to ask any questions? Really?
Anonymous sa…
quote: "Of particular concern is that the DfT made clear the new train could not have underfloor engines. Consequently, Bombardier and Siemens were unable to deploy a modified version of sucessful Voyager/Meridian desing.."

in "Thameslink rolling stock procurement: eleventh report of session 2010-12", Vol. 1 (Stationary Office) Ev43 http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=-L25JN49WjgC



It's possible that Bombardier did not remember correctly, and this statement is simply caused by pique. If not the current situation is bizarre.
Physiocrat sa…
Anonymous, can you clarify your first comment, it is not clear what you are trying to say.

To answer your second question in detail would require the services of an engineer and a barrister working together for several weeks to comb through all the relevant documents. However, in short, none of the bids satisfied all the requirements. Hitachi apparently was the nearest and was then given the opportunity to develop its concept into something practicable, though in the meantime the requirements had changed somewhat and there were further changes in response to some of the criticisms in the Foster report. Thus the IEP has been massively re-worked and now resembles the Voyager + pantograph car concept, which surely Bombardier would have offered if a fresh tender had been put out based on the final design for which the contract was awarded?
Anonymous sa…
That is because the modelling for HS2 has to be robust to warrant spending the money on it, yet if First or Virgin get their sums wrong there was (perhaps miss calculated as it turns out) a financial penalty (as well as a little margin of error within the amount of profit the companies make).
Whenever modelling is undertaken there is a fair amount of educated guessing and assumptions that have to be made, as such best practice is to be robust in the calculations as HS2 has been with the much lower than the current growth rate, whist the Virgin/first bids should have that robustness built in in other ways.

Populära inlägg i den här bloggen

The dreadfulness of British governance

I wrote to my MP on two entirely separate issues recently. The first was to do with the replacement for the Inter City 125 train, which at £2.6 million per vehicle, is twice as expensive as it ought to be. The second concerned the benefits of a switch from business rate and Council Tax to a tax based on site values. In both cases, the replies were full of spurious, unsubstantiated assertions and completely flawed arguments. This is typical. You will not get an iota of sense from the government on any area of public policy at all - finance, economics, trade and employment, agriculture, housing, health, transport, energy. All junk. If you write to your MP you will invariably receive answers that are an insult to your intelligence, no matter what subject you are writing about. Of course they cannot understand statistics. They are innumerate. Whitehall is staffed with idiots with a high IQ. Look at their IT projects. And mind your purse, they will have that too.

How much more will the British tolerate?

The British are phlegmatic, tolerant and slow to rouse. Thus there was no great reaction after the terrorist attack in July 2005. The murder of Lee Rigby created a sense of outrage, but nothing more, since it appeared to be an isolated incident. Two serious incidents within a fortnight are another matter. Since the first major terrorist incident in 2001, authority has tried to persuade the public that Islam is a religion of peace, that these were isolated events, or the actions of deranged "lone wolves", having nothing to do with Islam, or to reassure that the chances of being killed in a terrorist attack were infinitesimally small. These assurances are are beginning to wear thin. They no longer convince. If government does not act effectively, people will take the law into their own hands. What, however, would effective action look like? What sort of effective action would not amount to rough justice for a lot of innocent people? Given the difficulties of keeping large n...

Importing people to sustain demand

I got involved in a discussion with a Youtuber called “Philosophy all along”. This was in connection with criticism of Trump’s policy of deporting illegal migrants, which he argued would be bad for the economy as it would reduce demand. This implies that there is a need to import people to sustain demand. There is no obvious reason why a population should not be able to consume everything that the same population produces. If it can not, then something else is going on. It is a basic principle that wages are the least that workers will accept to do a job. Wages are a share of the value added by workers through their wages. The remainder is distributed as economic rent, after government has taken its cut in taxes. Monopoly profit is a temporary surplus that after a delay gets absorbed into economic rent. Land values in Silicon Valley are an example of this; it's like a gold rush. The miners get little out of it. Rent and tax syphon purchasing power away from those who produce the g...