Fortsätt till huvudinnehåll

Conservatives doing God could misfire

The Conservative chairman's visit to the Vatican on Tuesday is the latest example of how her party is increasingly willing to talk about religion.

It could misfire. Christianity sits uncomfortably with the policies of both political parties. What are the Conservatives to make of the laws on land tenure and usury set out in Chapter 25 of Leviticus?

There is worse: the encyclical Vix Pervenit of 1745 re-states the scriptural ban on usury, to say nothing of the entire body of Catholic Social Teaching encyclicals given out since 1891. These commence with Rerum Novarum, the encyclical signed by Pope Leo XIII, and continue to the latest, Benedict XVI's Caritas in Veritate of 2009 - which argues that justice is the foundation of charity.

The encyclicals from Quadragesimo Anno (1931) onwards argue the case for social responsibility in the economic sphere, setting the Popes up as advocates of principles well to the left of anything the British Labour Party would have dared to promote over the past couple of decades.

The politicians may get this thrown back in their face.

Kommentarer

Unknown sa…
Well, one could hope they would get it thrown back in their face, as you say. I personally hope to see the rise of the Catholic confessional state all over the world, as it was a more humane state, which the Reformation destroyed precisely in the name of excess profit. But none of these encyclicals are so radical as you let on, unless you have found that I didn't. Excepting Caritas in Veritate, they are no more than extensions of traditional teaching--a defense of private property, for example, a defense also of the right to strike. They all say the poor must be cared for, but none of them say the poor have a right to housing and food without working for it. So you would have to get a bit more concrete to make the point. The Catholicism we could expect from a Catholic state a strong work ethic, and yes, control of banks for the common good. We could expect defense of life from conception to grave. We could expect a systematic break down of the too-big-to fails, ala distributism, and if current distributists are a guide, they think of that in terms of several generations, not a law passed to begger big corporations tomorrow. We might expect the public to get a share in new wealth, rather than it going to the big corporations as presently, but not in the form of handouts, 'income redistribution,' which means nothing--real shares, real ownership. In any case, I saw a scheme like that in one of the distributist blogs, and it is not leftist in the sense we usually use the term. It's ownership in a culture of private ownership, not government ownership. The Catholic state would appear left on some things, and right on others--and is the solution we need. We are waking up to this, that's why you are blogging on it. I hope you continue to investigate. What do you think of Hungary's constitution? It's rather what I mean, commit oneself to the poor, as it does, and kick the gypsies off the dole at the same time. That needs done, and all of Europe is afraid to do it.
19 februari 2012 kl. 00:51
Skicka en kommentar

Populära inlägg i den här bloggen

The dreadfulness of British governance

I wrote to my MP on two entirely separate issues recently. The first was to do with the replacement for the Inter City 125 train, which at £2.6 million per vehicle, is twice as expensive as it ought to be. The second concerned the benefits of a switch from business rate and Council Tax to a tax based on site values. In both cases, the replies were full of spurious, unsubstantiated assertions and completely flawed arguments. This is typical. You will not get an iota of sense from the government on any area of public policy at all - finance, economics, trade and employment, agriculture, housing, health, transport, energy. All junk. If you write to your MP you will invariably receive answers that are an insult to your intelligence, no matter what subject you are writing about. Of course they cannot understand statistics. They are innumerate. Whitehall is staffed with idiots with a high IQ. Look at their IT projects. And mind your purse, they will have that too.
Skicka en kommentar
Läs mer

How much more will the British tolerate?

The British are phlegmatic, tolerant and slow to rouse. Thus there was no great reaction after the terrorist attack in July 2005. The murder of Lee Rigby created a sense of outrage, but nothing more, since it appeared to be an isolated incident. Two serious incidents within a fortnight are another matter. Since the first major terrorist incident in 2001, authority has tried to persuade the public that Islam is a religion of peace, that these were isolated events, or the actions of deranged "lone wolves", having nothing to do with Islam, or to reassure that the chances of being killed in a terrorist attack were infinitesimally small. These assurances are are beginning to wear thin. They no longer convince. If government does not act effectively, people will take the law into their own hands. What, however, would effective action look like? What sort of effective action would not amount to rough justice for a lot of innocent people? Given the difficulties of keeping large n...
Skicka en kommentar
Läs mer

Importing people to sustain demand

I got involved in a discussion with a Youtuber called “Philosophy all along”. This was in connection with criticism of Trump’s policy of deporting illegal migrants, which he argued would be bad for the economy as it would reduce demand. This implies that there is a need to import people to sustain demand. There is no obvious reason why a population should not be able to consume everything that the same population produces. If it can not, then something else is going on. It is a basic principle that wages are the least that workers will accept to do a job. Wages are a share of the value added by workers through their wages. The remainder is distributed as economic rent, after government has taken its cut in taxes. Monopoly profit is a temporary surplus that after a delay gets absorbed into economic rent. Land values in Silicon Valley are an example of this; it's like a gold rush. The miners get little out of it. Rent and tax syphon purchasing power away from those who produce the g...
Skicka en kommentar
Läs mer