Fortsätt till huvudinnehåll

Why do I find this music so unpleasant?



There is a certain type of church music written in the 1970s and 80s that I find irritating in the extreme to listen to. There is a clutch of composers who were producing this kind of thing then, particularly in the Catholic church. If I hear it on the radio I will turn it off. Fast. If I think there is a risk of hearing it in a service, I will travel a considerable distance or get out of bed early on a Sunday morning to avoid it and find at least a silent service somewhere.

Why this is so I cannot understand. It is not discordant. It is actually quite tuneful. Perhaps there is something about the tonality of the music itself? Perhaps it stirs up an unpleasant memory? All I know is that I do not want to be around when it is being performed. Even less do I want to sing it. I know also that I am not alone in my dislike of the works of these composers.

I think, however, that it is a technical thing to do with the music, or even a biological effect, because it actually makes my flesh creep. The effect on me is exactly like an allergy to food or dust. There is something about it that repels the mind.

This is not as far-fetched as it sounds. There have been experiments done to see how different types of music activates different parts of the brain. It has been shown that Baroque music, in particular, has a calming effect and even helps recovery from operations, and not just amongst humans. It apparently has an effect on mice! Perhaps there is a professional musician out there who can explain?

Perhaps also it is because it STANDS FOR the deliberate ignoring and destruction of ancient tradition. Somehow it seems to embody the spirit of the the post-Vatican 2 church and the subsequent misinterpretation of the Council's deliberations. It is of a piece with plain polyester vestments, the mistranslation of the text into English, communion received standing, under both kinds and the Body of Christ in the hand, the insensitive and expensive reordering of perfectly good churches from the nineteeth and early twentieth century, new churches that could equally well be cafeterias in a park, railway stations or in the worst case, public toilets - the list goes on and on.

It might even go further than that: encapsulating the ugliness of an entire age - tower blocks, out-of-town shopping malls, multi-storey car parks, urban motorways, unpleasant new sliding door trains and one-person buses, cars styled by marketing directors...

And what is wrong with this, which everyone knows and needs no rehearsal?

Kommentarer

Patricius sa…
"I think, however, that it is a technical thing to do with the music, or even a biological effect, because it actually makes my flesh creep. The effect on me is exactly like an allergy to food or dust."

I think you have a point here. It is, to my mind, rather like overdosing on sugar.
Physiocrat sa…
I think it is a technical thing to do with the music. We tried to sing a piece by Ulf Samuelsson and that made my flesh creep. But what is it? Can anyone explain?

Populära inlägg i den här bloggen

The dreadfulness of British governance

I wrote to my MP on two entirely separate issues recently. The first was to do with the replacement for the Inter City 125 train, which at £2.6 million per vehicle, is twice as expensive as it ought to be. The second concerned the benefits of a switch from business rate and Council Tax to a tax based on site values. In both cases, the replies were full of spurious, unsubstantiated assertions and completely flawed arguments. This is typical. You will not get an iota of sense from the government on any area of public policy at all - finance, economics, trade and employment, agriculture, housing, health, transport, energy. All junk. If you write to your MP you will invariably receive answers that are an insult to your intelligence, no matter what subject you are writing about. Of course they cannot understand statistics. They are innumerate. Whitehall is staffed with idiots with a high IQ. Look at their IT projects. And mind your purse, they will have that too.

How much more will the British tolerate?

The British are phlegmatic, tolerant and slow to rouse. Thus there was no great reaction after the terrorist attack in July 2005. The murder of Lee Rigby created a sense of outrage, but nothing more, since it appeared to be an isolated incident. Two serious incidents within a fortnight are another matter. Since the first major terrorist incident in 2001, authority has tried to persuade the public that Islam is a religion of peace, that these were isolated events, or the actions of deranged "lone wolves", having nothing to do with Islam, or to reassure that the chances of being killed in a terrorist attack were infinitesimally small. These assurances are are beginning to wear thin. They no longer convince. If government does not act effectively, people will take the law into their own hands. What, however, would effective action look like? What sort of effective action would not amount to rough justice for a lot of innocent people? Given the difficulties of keeping large n...

Importing people to sustain demand

I got involved in a discussion with a Youtuber called “Philosophy all along”. This was in connection with criticism of Trump’s policy of deporting illegal migrants, which he argued would be bad for the economy as it would reduce demand. This implies that there is a need to import people to sustain demand. There is no obvious reason why a population should not be able to consume everything that the same population produces. If it can not, then something else is going on. It is a basic principle that wages are the least that workers will accept to do a job. Wages are a share of the value added by workers through their wages. The remainder is distributed as economic rent, after government has taken its cut in taxes. Monopoly profit is a temporary surplus that after a delay gets absorbed into economic rent. Land values in Silicon Valley are an example of this; it's like a gold rush. The miners get little out of it. Rent and tax syphon purchasing power away from those who produce the g...