I have just received an energy efficiency appraisal for my house, which is required before I can sell it. It contains advice on steps that could be taking to make it more efficient. These included
One measure not suggested in the report was the use of a dehumidifier. In damp weather it can feel uncomfortably chilly even though the outside temperature is 15 degrees or more. It is then necessary to heat the building to around 25 degrees. By removing the moisture, the environment is comfortable at a lower temperature. A dehumidifier is also an efficient substitute for a tumbler drier, extracting the latent heat from the evaporating moisture and distributing it around the house as warm, dry air.
- Fit low energy bulbs at a cost of £15 to save £23 a year
- Upgrade heating controls at a cost of £350 - £450 to save £38 a year
- Replace boiler with new condensing boiler at a cost of £1,500 - £3,500 to save £46 a year
- Solar water heating £4,000 - £6,000 to save £33 a year
- Replace single glazed windows with double glazed at a cost of £2,500 - £6,500 to save £70 a year
- Fit photovoltaic panels at a cost of £11,000 - £20,000 to save £222 a year
From which it can be concluded that the most effective energy-saving measure I could make would be to put on an extra layer of clothes.
One measure not suggested in the report was the use of a dehumidifier. In damp weather it can feel uncomfortably chilly even though the outside temperature is 15 degrees or more. It is then necessary to heat the building to around 25 degrees. By removing the moisture, the environment is comfortable at a lower temperature. A dehumidifier is also an efficient substitute for a tumbler drier, extracting the latent heat from the evaporating moisture and distributing it around the house as warm, dry air.
Kommentarer
Here is my post in full:
"@Physiocrat
I have a question for you about LVT.
Say that people build on land and then provide private services, such as clinics or education, and this pushes up the value of land in the area (as services and perhaps skilled employment are within short distance), how then would you value the land on which these services are provided from?
Take, say, a good private school or a clinic, or even a railway station, which adds x amount of value to the surrounding land. Since the property(hypothetically) increases the value of the surrounding land itself, but in order to value the land you should discount the value of the property... then won't you necessarily overestimate the value of the land the school or clinic is built upon since the value of the land it is built upon is related to the service that the building provides?
I would appreciate your thoughts."
Each site is valued in turn, on the assumption that it were vacant but that everything around was as it is.