Fortsätt till huvudinnehåll

What rolling stock?

One of the great unanswered questions concerning HS2 is what kind of rolling stock will run on it? British rolling stock is lower and narrower than standard continental stock. And standard continental stock is too tall and wide to run on existing railways in Britain. Will there be a small fleet of continental-sized stock that will be confined to the new lines? And will it be necessary to build a special, and therefore expensive, fleet of British-sized high speed trains that can run on existing routes?

This raises yet another question. Continental stock actually varies in size from one country to another. Scandinavian trains are wider than those anywhere else, which makes for added comfort, or alternatively, more seats can be fitted into the carriages. And would also be possible to build the line large enough to accommodate double-deck trains that did not have low curved ceilings like those in most of Europe apart from Finland, where the gauge is slightly wider. (1525 mm instead of 1435 mm). I cannot find any discussion of this issue.

Kommentarer

Anonymous sa…
Also a lack of any info on where the new trains will be procured. Are they to be bought from Europe, or built here. Or maybe Hitachi would like to use their Intercity Express Programme factory (if that project goes forward) to build Japanese type high speed trains for the UK market.

I wonder if the government has a master plan regarding this, or maybe they haven't noticed that the UK's ability to make trains isn't what it was post privatisation.
Anonymous sa…
http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm78/7827/7827.pdf

Section 8.5 onwards (around page 128), specifically sections 8.8 onwards.

In the document above they consider both high speed trains built to british loading gauge, and gauge enhancement, appearing to favour trains built to the british loading gauge.

I haven't found any specific mention of the loading gauge, but it seems to be likely that it will be at least to double deck westerern european standards. As the EU documents on technical standards for interoperability on high speed lines are mentioned I would guess they will work to that. EU Directive 96/48/EC seems to be the relevant document, though it may have been superceded - it mentions (quote) "UIC 505-1, GA, GB or GC" http://eur-lex.europa.eu/pri/en/oj/dat/2002/l_245/l_24520020912en04020506.pdf section 4.1.4 and notes at the end.

According to wikipedia, Arup's early capacity calculations were based on the largest of those GC.

Quote: "HS2 Ltd’s technical specification for High Speed Two complies fully with
EU Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSI), including European
structure gauge"
Physiocrat sa…
Double-deck western European standard is sub-standard. The 1525 mm gauge Finnish double deck trains are not, with full height upper decks and overhead luggage shelves. Likewise the 1435 mm gauge double-deck stock in the USA. If the wretched line is going to be built it should at least accommodate full-size double-deck vehicles, not the things you have to avoid bashing your head due to the curved ceiling.
Anonymous sa…
http://tr.scribd.com/doc/97918347/hsr-rs-final-en

I found this adress. There is a document all hsr vehicles.

Populära inlägg i den här bloggen

Importing people to sustain demand

I got involved in a discussion with a Youtuber called “Philosophy all along”. This was in connection with criticism of Trump’s policy of deporting illegal migrants, which he argued would be bad for the economy as it would reduce demand. This implies that there is a need to import people to sustain demand. There is no obvious reason why a population should not be able to consume everything that the same population produces. If it can not, then something else is going on. It is a basic principle that wages are the least that workers will accept to do a job. Wages are a share of the value added by workers through their wages. The remainder is distributed as economic rent, after government has taken its cut in taxes. Monopoly profit is a temporary surplus that after a delay gets absorbed into economic rent. Land values in Silicon Valley are an example of this; it's like a gold rush. The miners get little out of it. Rent and tax syphon purchasing power away from those who produce the g...

The dreadfulness of British governance

I wrote to my MP on two entirely separate issues recently. The first was to do with the replacement for the Inter City 125 train, which at £2.6 million per vehicle, is twice as expensive as it ought to be. The second concerned the benefits of a switch from business rate and Council Tax to a tax based on site values. In both cases, the replies were full of spurious, unsubstantiated assertions and completely flawed arguments. This is typical. You will not get an iota of sense from the government on any area of public policy at all - finance, economics, trade and employment, agriculture, housing, health, transport, energy. All junk. If you write to your MP you will invariably receive answers that are an insult to your intelligence, no matter what subject you are writing about. Of course they cannot understand statistics. They are innumerate. Whitehall is staffed with idiots with a high IQ. Look at their IT projects. And mind your purse, they will have that too.

How much more will the British tolerate?

The British are phlegmatic, tolerant and slow to rouse. Thus there was no great reaction after the terrorist attack in July 2005. The murder of Lee Rigby created a sense of outrage, but nothing more, since it appeared to be an isolated incident. Two serious incidents within a fortnight are another matter. Since the first major terrorist incident in 2001, authority has tried to persuade the public that Islam is a religion of peace, that these were isolated events, or the actions of deranged "lone wolves", having nothing to do with Islam, or to reassure that the chances of being killed in a terrorist attack were infinitesimally small. These assurances are are beginning to wear thin. They no longer convince. If government does not act effectively, people will take the law into their own hands. What, however, would effective action look like? What sort of effective action would not amount to rough justice for a lot of innocent people? Given the difficulties of keeping large n...