Fortsätt till huvudinnehåll

Satisfaction after 47 years

I was furious for two reasons when Britain joined the the European Economic Community in 1973.

The first was the return of the Corn Laws, 127 years after they had been repealed in 1846, after many decades of hard campaigning by people like David Ricardo and William Cobbett, a campaign punctuated by events such as the Peterloo Massacre and the Swing Riots. The result was that cheap food from Commonwealth countries and a few other traditional suppliers was locked out of the the country, leading to a chain of events including a round of strikes for more pay to keep up with the higher cost of living, the Three Day Week, the Winter of Discontent, the election of Margaret Thatcher and the Falklands War; the latter would obviously not have happened as long as Britain was one of Argentina’s biggest customers.

The second was the replacement of Purchase Tax, a bad tax but we could live with it, by the infinitely worse EuroTax, VAT, which fails all four of Smith’s Canons of Taxation – a considerable achievement, but it was invented by a German who was obviously unfamiliar with Smith. It was sold on the myth that it is neutral and non-distorting, which is like saying that putting sand in your car’s lubrication system will not damage any particular component more than any other. A more harmful and inefficient tax would be difficult to devise.

The difficulty now is that the EU mantra that “our farmers” need protection is embedded and will be difficult to shift, while for decades, Tory governments have pushed up the rates of VAT so as to reduce the headline rates of income tax, which looks good in election manifestos, and the public is fooled. So undoing the damage will not be so easy and take more than just Brexit.

It is a myth that the EU led to a renewal of prosperity in Britain. The prosperity never extended far beyond the motorway corridors a couple of hours drive away from London. The EU regional development grants led to little or now trickle-down. Personally, the EU gave me an opportunity to go and live in another country at a time when Britain was going through a bad phase in the middle of the 2000s, but the problems – primarily due to the decisions resulting from long-term misgovernment – have caught up and overtaken me in the country to which I have moved. Hopefully, change will come here after Brexit as the forces that lead to these political shifts are not confined within national borders.

The EU has evolved from what is sometimes described as a “noble concept” into a sprawling monster with a remarkable ability to mess up, consistently, almost every policy area it gets involved in. Britain is well out of this failing enterprise.

Kommentarer

Populära inlägg i den här bloggen

Importing people to sustain demand

I got involved in a discussion with a Youtuber called “Philosophy all along”. This was in connection with criticism of Trump’s policy of deporting illegal migrants, which he argued would be bad for the economy as it would reduce demand. This implies that there is a need to import people to sustain demand. There is no obvious reason why a population should not be able to consume everything that the same population produces. If it can not, then something else is going on. It is a basic principle that wages are the least that workers will accept to do a job. Wages are a share of the value added by workers through their wages. The remainder is distributed as economic rent, after government has taken its cut in taxes. Monopoly profit is a temporary surplus that after a delay gets absorbed into economic rent. Land values in Silicon Valley are an example of this; it's like a gold rush. The miners get little out of it. Rent and tax syphon purchasing power away from those who produce the g...

The dreadfulness of British governance

I wrote to my MP on two entirely separate issues recently. The first was to do with the replacement for the Inter City 125 train, which at £2.6 million per vehicle, is twice as expensive as it ought to be. The second concerned the benefits of a switch from business rate and Council Tax to a tax based on site values. In both cases, the replies were full of spurious, unsubstantiated assertions and completely flawed arguments. This is typical. You will not get an iota of sense from the government on any area of public policy at all - finance, economics, trade and employment, agriculture, housing, health, transport, energy. All junk. If you write to your MP you will invariably receive answers that are an insult to your intelligence, no matter what subject you are writing about. Of course they cannot understand statistics. They are innumerate. Whitehall is staffed with idiots with a high IQ. Look at their IT projects. And mind your purse, they will have that too.

How much more will the British tolerate?

The British are phlegmatic, tolerant and slow to rouse. Thus there was no great reaction after the terrorist attack in July 2005. The murder of Lee Rigby created a sense of outrage, but nothing more, since it appeared to be an isolated incident. Two serious incidents within a fortnight are another matter. Since the first major terrorist incident in 2001, authority has tried to persuade the public that Islam is a religion of peace, that these were isolated events, or the actions of deranged "lone wolves", having nothing to do with Islam, or to reassure that the chances of being killed in a terrorist attack were infinitesimally small. These assurances are are beginning to wear thin. They no longer convince. If government does not act effectively, people will take the law into their own hands. What, however, would effective action look like? What sort of effective action would not amount to rough justice for a lot of innocent people? Given the difficulties of keeping large n...