The reactions of different governments to the epidemic have highlighted, yet again, that the time is now overdue to ask fundamental questions
about the purpose of government. How about this as a starting point: that government should confine
itself to doing what no other body can do? In this connection we have to
bear in mind that disputed areas such as teaching, and care of the sick
and poor, were, before the Reformation, carried out under the umbrella of
the Catholic Church.
Following on from there is the need for debate on
how the expenses of government should be paid for. The present tax
system is essentially a structure of fines and penalties for
successfully engaging in legal economic activity. That cannot be good
for the moral health of the nation, since taxes are the fiscal
expression of the relationship between individual householders and the
government.
A useful starting point for this discussion is Adam
Smith’s chapter ‛On the sources of revenue’, in the original text, not
an edited version. Smith’s is not the last word on the subject, but libertarians and others on the political right will find it surprisingly uncomfortable.
Prenumerera på:
Kommentarer till inlägget (Atom)
Battery trains fool’s gold
A piece by the railway news video Green Signals recently reported the fast charging trials for battery operated electric trains on the West ...
-
I wrote to my MP on two entirely separate issues recently. The first was to do with the replacement for the Inter City 125 train, which at £...
-
The ultimate net zero lunacy is probably de-carbonising and trying to electrify the entire railway system. In the first place, the railways...
-
The FT has run a couple of pieces on Sweden this week. The first was a report of the outbreak of car burning, the second, today, on the rise...
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar