Fortsätt till huvudinnehåll

Crossrail 2

Crossrail2 is a project for a new cross-London railway running roughly from the south-west to the north-east. It is not a vanity scheme in itself - on the contrary, it is a long-overdue construction of a project first put forward in 1904 and from time to time ever since. It links together existing routes which at present running to Waterloo, by diverting them into an underground route northwards to Seven Sisters and Tottenham. Amongst other benefits, this will reduce pressure on congested Waterloo.

There are questions, nevertheless. From the south-west, four separate routes converge into one, which is always a potential source of operating difficulties. At the northern end, the line splits into two, which means that some of the trains arriving from the south will have to turn back before they get to the end of the route, probably at Tottenham or Seven Sisters.

More seriously, should it be built as a full-scale railway with overhead electrification, or as a tube? The former, with 6 metre diameter tunnels, involves excavating three times as much material as a 3.5 metre diameter tube.

A related issue is the choice of electrification. The routes from the south-west are already electrified with a 750V DC conductor rail supply. If this were continued throughout the length of the tunnels, the latter could be constructed to a 5 metre diameter instead of 6 metres, ie only 70% of the excavation volume. A conductor rail DC system would also avoid having to fit the trains with heavy transformers, as well as providing greater reliability and reduced maintenance costs, since conductor rail electrification is almost a fit-and-forget arrangement.

The argument usually given for 25KV electrification is that it is more energy-efficient, which is true over long distances where transmission loss becomes an issue at low voltages due to the much higher currents. However, Crossrail 2 is a short-distance railway and transmission losses are not going to be so significant.



Kommentarer

Skicka en kommentar

Populära inlägg i den här bloggen

Importing people to sustain demand

I got involved in a discussion with a Youtuber called “Philosophy all along”. This was in connection with criticism of Trump’s policy of deporting illegal migrants, which he argued would be bad for the economy as it would reduce demand. This implies that there is a need to import people to sustain demand. There is no obvious reason why a population should not be able to consume everything that the same population produces. If it can not, then something else is going on. It is a basic principle that wages are the least that workers will accept to do a job. Wages are a share of the value added by workers through their wages. The remainder is distributed as economic rent, after government has taken its cut in taxes. Monopoly profit is a temporary surplus that after a delay gets absorbed into economic rent. Land values in Silicon Valley are an example of this; it's like a gold rush. The miners get little out of it. Rent and tax syphon purchasing power away from those who produce the g...
Skicka en kommentar
Läs mer

The Zombie Train that refuses to die

The Guardian has published a couple more articles against HS2, one by specialist rail commentator Christian Wolmar, and another today by journalist Simon Jenkins. The main arguments in favour will doubtless be wheeled out by the commentators: the need for capacity and the disruption caused by upgrading existing routes. HST itself will severely disrupt services to Euston during the construction period. Capacity can be increased at a fraction of the cost by a variety of measures, provided that it is accepted that the additional traffic will run at existing speeds. It is not generally known that the Midland main line is, or was, four track all the way from London to Trent Junction, between Nottingham and Derby. This is because the additional tracks are separate, having been added for coal trains which trundled down to Brent sidings, on the edge of London, from a collection point at Toton in Nottinghamshire, where the Midland Railway build a huge marshalling yard. Beyond Derby, the main l...
Skicka en kommentar
Läs mer

How much more will the British tolerate?

The British are phlegmatic, tolerant and slow to rouse. Thus there was no great reaction after the terrorist attack in July 2005. The murder of Lee Rigby created a sense of outrage, but nothing more, since it appeared to be an isolated incident. Two serious incidents within a fortnight are another matter. Since the first major terrorist incident in 2001, authority has tried to persuade the public that Islam is a religion of peace, that these were isolated events, or the actions of deranged "lone wolves", having nothing to do with Islam, or to reassure that the chances of being killed in a terrorist attack were infinitesimally small. These assurances are are beginning to wear thin. They no longer convince. If government does not act effectively, people will take the law into their own hands. What, however, would effective action look like? What sort of effective action would not amount to rough justice for a lot of innocent people? Given the difficulties of keeping large n...
Skicka en kommentar
Läs mer