Fortsätt till huvudinnehåll

Inlägg

Who to vote for?

I intend to vote for Reform (if the postal voting form arrives in time) but their policies are not up to dealing with the problems that face the country. These have their roots in the theories that have been current for the past 100 years in the departments of economics in Oxbridge and the London School of Economics, and which circulate within the civil service and and the government. Until these theories are recognised as bogus, policies which might succeed are simply not available to whoever gets elected.  At their root is the notion that government revenue should be raised primarily from taxes on productive and legal economic activity. This is ultimately self-defeating, since it leads to a death spiral. The present mania for bringing ever more people into the country is a desperate attempt to escape the inevitable. The system was never viable, and much government spending has had to be financed by inflation; sterling has lost 98% of its value since the end of the war, and there...

What is this weird lightweight train for?

Revolution VLR is a project for ultra lightweight trains for use on routes where traffic is relatively light. It is described as “an innovative, lightweight, cost-effective rail vehicle that provides a compelling alternative to operating traditional heavy rail vehicles on branch lines. Its low mass reduces all aspects of operating costs and can significantly improve the business cases for line reopenings and extensions, enhancing local connectivity. RVLR’s innovative design combines automotive and rail technologies to provide an attractive, environmentally and economically sustainable product that can be deployed rapidly. RVLR facilitates modal shift and enhanced public transport connectivity. It supports a more affordable, greener future for our railways.” I look at this and scratch my head. What were the designers thinking of? It is a curious design, with vehicles only 18.5 metres long (when the standard mark 1 length of 20 metres can run over the entire British system and another me...

Railway ticket and fares shambles

Once upon a time, a train ticket was a small piece of thick card which you bought at the station when you wanted to travel. You would turn up a few minutes early in case there was a queue at the ticket office, which was staffed by a human being who knew his job. Then you waited for your train and made your journey. And that was all. Nowadays, except for local journeys, you have to book in advance and have to travel in a particular train. You might have to buy the ticket on a mobile phone, or else you will have to negotiate a terminal with a confusing and poorly designed touch screen, with every train company having a different layout and programme flow. There is a bewildering variety of tickets and prices. In the latest version of the Swedish Railways (SJ) booking system, there is no means of changing your booking or getting a refund if something crops up. You have to allow an extra half hour or more to be certain of catching the train you have booked for. The railways have adopted one...

Ultimate net zero lunacy?

The ultimate net zero lunacy is probably de-carbonising and trying to electrify the entire railway system.  In the first place, the railways in total are not a major consumer of energy. Secondly, a huge amount of energy used by the railways is embodied in structures, rolling stock and electrification equipment. Thirdly, any measures that make the use of railways unnecessarily expensive encourage the use of less efficient alternatives.  An immense amount of energy is used up in the manufacture of aluminium railway vehicles and the massive steel electrification gallows and goalposts used to hold up the copper wires, which also takes a lot of energy to mine and refine. Oddly enough the railways of sixty years ago were probably more energy efficient. Locomotives and rolling stock were kept in use for nearly double as long as today, passenger trains ran at 75 mph and freight trundled along at 15 mph on its own lines, the aim being to keep the trains rolling as far as possible on as...

Brexits misslyckande

Brexits misslyckande ska inte vara en varning mot Swexit. Strax efter Brexit 2020 kom Corona-inlåsningen vilken visade sig senare onödig men ekonomin blev allvarligt skadade. Efter kom Sunaks helikopterpengar som är huvudorsaken till den nuvarande pågående prishöjningar. Vi också förstår att den brittiska regeringen och statsförvaltningen alltid var strängt emot Brexit. De ville inte ta fördelar av de möjligheter för verklig frihandel och skattereformer; man kan säger t o m sabotage. Storbritannien kunde ha blivit av med den skadliga Eurotax - MOMS som vid 20 % krymper ekonomin ner åtminstone 5% BNP. Storbritannien liknar en fånge som stannar kvar i sin cell när han har släpptes. Förmodligen vill den Brittiska regelklassn inte göra ändringarna eftersom de hoppas att Storbritannien ska återgå EU. Swexit ska vara målet men efter bör vi dra nytta av alla möjligheter inkl skattereformer och verklig frihandel (vilket inte är samma sak som frihandelsavtal).

Västtrafiks virtue signalling for Pride month

Regnbåge flaggar på fordon. Behövs inte. De retar upp folk i onöd, särskilda muslimer för att det går emot sina tro. Det finns tillräckliga regnbåge och flaggor och varianter i stan under Pride månad. Det skulle bli bättre att lägga er uppenbarliga bristande resurser och pengar till rengöring av GS spårvagnars smutsiga ytor med hänsyn till de ljusmålade ytor övanpå fönster. Och att fixa nummerskyltar. Svar från Västtrafik Tack för att du hörde av dig till oss på Västtrafik! Att ställa sig bakom budskapet om allas lika värde är en självklarhet för oss. Alla ska känna sig välkomna i kollektivtrafiken. Genom att flagga tar vi ställning för det färgerna symboliserar – inkludering och mångfald. Västtrafik står bakom West Prides vision om en jämlik och inkluderande värld fri från fördomar och diskriminering. Om du har en specifik klagomål på nogon buss som inte funkar eller är trasig kan du såklart återkomma till oss med en specifik tur det gäller på och vi kollar närmare på det. Skulle ...