Fortsätt till huvudinnehåll

HS3 - the high speed madness gets worse

Reports are that Chancellor George Osborne is pushing a proposal for a high speed line, "HS3", between Manchester and Leeds. This is conclusive proof that the man is clueless. This is a typical politician's response.

There is no advantage in running faster than 100 mph between destinations less than 50 miles apart. There are no further useful time savings to be made. Frequent trains and good local connections are needed. That means a programme of platform-lengthening, junction improvements, and possibly, new routes, but high speed does not come into this. Loading-gauge enhancements to take double-deck trains would be nice to have but the trouble is that the routes on which they could operate would be badly restricted.

Equally important in this context is the need to improve local connections through the development of bus and light rail services, as well as park-and-ride facilities.

Kommentarer

Anonymous sa…
The high-speed rail link between Manchester and Leeds will never be high a true speed, aka 220mph. You need new high-speed track for that and the line needs to be as straight as possible, which cannot be the case crossing the Pennines with major money being spent having the line in tunnel most of the way. The best they can get is 130-140mph even with boring the odd tunnel here and there to straighten up the curved line running up and down through the Pennine hills. That means they will use existing track most of the way and existing rail stock - probably tilting Pendolino trains. The currently twisting line puts 100mph trains averaging 50mph.

The current Manchester to Leeds line is underpowered diesel trains. Electrifying the existing line would increase the journey time from 50 minutes to 30 minutes alone, new tunnels removing bottlenecks will improve it a little further, tilting trains further again.

The existing near dead-straight and level Liverpool to Manchester line is being electrified right now being operational at the end of the year. Electrify the existing Liverpool to Leeds line, Manchester is between, and this is just the normal under planning trans-Pennine route. A "hub" at Manchester is being created to enable Liverpool trains to run right through at near full line speed. A few of Osborn's tunnels would help.

This Osborne announcement is not high-speed rail at all, it cannot be using existing track, and is clearly a political ploy to gain points in an election year from the north of England. It is clearly electioneering.

I hope no HS2 track gets above the proposed Crewe hub and the fast trans-Pennine line is completed ASAP. This is the best outcome for the north of England as it will be linked up easily and fast. It will help Liverpool, the big loser in high-speed rail, as it stands. The Liverpool and Manchester time to London would be the same, instead of Manchester being 40 minutes faster. Even KPMG predicted Liverpool economically would lose out. To economically curtail a region is totally wrong.

Populära inlägg i den här bloggen

Importing people to sustain demand

I got involved in a discussion with a Youtuber called “Philosophy all along”. This was in connection with criticism of Trump’s policy of deporting illegal migrants, which he argued would be bad for the economy as it would reduce demand. This implies that there is a need to import people to sustain demand. There is no obvious reason why a population should not be able to consume everything that the same population produces. If it can not, then something else is going on. It is a basic principle that wages are the least that workers will accept to do a job. Wages are a share of the value added by workers through their wages. The remainder is distributed as economic rent, after government has taken its cut in taxes. Monopoly profit is a temporary surplus that after a delay gets absorbed into economic rent. Land values in Silicon Valley are an example of this; it's like a gold rush. The miners get little out of it. Rent and tax syphon purchasing power away from those who produce the g...

The Zombie Train that refuses to die

The Guardian has published a couple more articles against HS2, one by specialist rail commentator Christian Wolmar, and another today by journalist Simon Jenkins. The main arguments in favour will doubtless be wheeled out by the commentators: the need for capacity and the disruption caused by upgrading existing routes. HST itself will severely disrupt services to Euston during the construction period. Capacity can be increased at a fraction of the cost by a variety of measures, provided that it is accepted that the additional traffic will run at existing speeds. It is not generally known that the Midland main line is, or was, four track all the way from London to Trent Junction, between Nottingham and Derby. This is because the additional tracks are separate, having been added for coal trains which trundled down to Brent sidings, on the edge of London, from a collection point at Toton in Nottinghamshire, where the Midland Railway build a huge marshalling yard. Beyond Derby, the main l...

How much more will the British tolerate?

The British are phlegmatic, tolerant and slow to rouse. Thus there was no great reaction after the terrorist attack in July 2005. The murder of Lee Rigby created a sense of outrage, but nothing more, since it appeared to be an isolated incident. Two serious incidents within a fortnight are another matter. Since the first major terrorist incident in 2001, authority has tried to persuade the public that Islam is a religion of peace, that these were isolated events, or the actions of deranged "lone wolves", having nothing to do with Islam, or to reassure that the chances of being killed in a terrorist attack were infinitesimally small. These assurances are are beginning to wear thin. They no longer convince. If government does not act effectively, people will take the law into their own hands. What, however, would effective action look like? What sort of effective action would not amount to rough justice for a lot of innocent people? Given the difficulties of keeping large n...